The American Dream Is Alive and Well, but Will the Starter Home Survive?

Posted on Jun 16 2016 - 4:48pm by Suzanne De Vita

new houseAchieving the American Dream conventionally involved acquiring a starter home—purchasing a house for life led now, with the intention to trade up to a home that meets needs in the future.

The Dream’s alive and well. Starter homes? Hardly.

A solid three-quarters of first-time homebuyers polled by Bank of America would prefer to forgo an entry-level home and buy a home for the life they expect to live. “Go directly to your forever home,” their cards read. “Do not pass go. Do not collect $200.”

Sixty-eight percent of those surveyed would rather save for a trade-up home than invest in a starter—a finding that speaks to the 56 percent who say they currently cannot afford the type of home they want.

Affordability concerns, however, exist all around. First-timers who would prefer to buy an entry-level home (25 percent) may lose out to all-cash offers by investors, who’ve recognized opportunity for profit through rentals. Dwindling supply, also attributed to still-underwater, would-be sellers, is placing upward pressure on prices. As Trulia reports, starter home inventory has dropped off 43.6 percent in recent years, down to 238,461 on the market in 2016 from 423,012 on the market in 2012.

Resulting bidding wars have raised starter home prices by 6 percent in the last year, FNC, Inc reports—the median price rose by only 4.3 percent over the same period. The median list price of a starter home, according to Trulia, is $154,156.

Related: Millennials and the New American Dream

Notably, 35 percent of those surveyed by Bank of America want the first home they purchase to be the home they retire in—in effect, a “start-to-finish” home. This assumes the home is in an area where establishing personal and professional lives long-term is viable; for many first-timers, their current location is not. Paralleling their desire to save more for a future-needs-focused home is the desire to purchase only after they’ve settled in an area they’re confident will serve them in their golden years.

This preference, combined with waning interest, shrinking inventory and escalating prices, have rendered starter homes all but obsolete in some of the country’s hottest markets, including Austin, Denver, San Francisco and Portland, Trulia reports. (Starters in markets like Detroit, Indianapolis and Memphis are still available and affordable.)

Anyone who’s played Monopoly knows just how long the game can last. To first-time homebuyers, skirting the starter home is a strategic advantage; holding out for a forever home—those further-down-the-board properties—is the winning play.

1 Comment so far. Feel free to join this conversation.

  1. Kiersten June 30, 2016 at 12:52 am - Reply

    I love what you guys tend to be up too. Such
    clever work and coverage! Keep up the good works guys
    I’ve added you guys to my own blogroll.

Leave A Response